Skip to main content
    Embedded Finance & Payments

    Embedded Finance & Payments — Rails, Ledgers, and Compliance Built In

    Embedded finance is the easiest product decision and the hardest engineering problem. The first Stripe integration takes a day. The ledger that reconciles every cent at T+0, the KYC pipeline that doesn't convert customers away, and the chargeback workflow that doesn't require a dedicated ops team — those take real engineering.

    A payment, end to end
    1. 1
      Initiation
      User action — checkout, transfer, card swipe
    2. 2
      KYC / AML check
      Automated screen before authorization
    3. 3
      PSP auth
      Stripe / Adyen / network authorization
    4. 4
      Ledger entry
      Double-entry posted atomically — both sides
    5. 5
      Settlement
      Reconciled to bank statement, penny-perfect

    Chargeback and dispute flow runs in parallel — evidence assembled automatically before the deadline.

    What you get

    Payment rail architecture with a PSP abstraction layer — Stripe, Adyen, Checkout.com, or direct card network, switchable without a rewrite
    Double-entry bookkeeping ledger engineered to your data model — every cent accounted for, every transaction immutable, every balance reconcilable in under a second at your expected volume
    Card issuing integration (Marqeta, Lithic, or Stripe Issuing) with program setup, spend controls, and virtual/physical card delivery
    KYC / AML pipeline with automated document verification (Persona, Jumio, or Onfido), sanctions screening, and a human-review queue that meets your regulator's SLA
    Chargeback and dispute management workflow — automated evidence assembly, deadline tracking, and win-rate reporting
    Settlement reconciliation that catches penny discrepancies before they become audit findings — batched nightly or continuous at higher volumes

    When it fits

    • Payments, wallets, or card issuing are a product feature, not a peripheral integration
    • Volume or margin make third-party aggregators the wrong economic choice within your 3-year model
    • Regulatory environment (money transmission license, e-money, banking charter) requires direct relationships with the rails
    • You need a ledger that's auditable — not Stripe's dashboard exports, but a real double-entry system you own

    When it doesn't

    • Payment is a simple checkout integration — use Stripe Checkout and don't over-engineer
    • You haven't validated that users will actually pay — build the product first, optimize the rails later
    • You're building in a jurisdiction with complex local-scheme requirements (UPI, PIX, iDEAL) you haven't mapped yet — discovery first

    Process

    Week 1–2: payment architecture review, PSP shortlist, ledger schema design. Weeks 3–6: PSP integration, ledger implementation, KYC pipeline. Weeks 7–10: card issuing (if applicable), dispute workflow, settlement reconciliation. Weeks 11–12: load testing, compliance documentation handover.

    Full delivery process

    Pricing

    Fixed-price by scope. Basic payment integration + ledger: $100–200k. Full embedded finance stack (payments + ledger + card issuing + KYC): $250–600k. PSP and BaaS fees billed at your rates — we're not in the interchange. License and banking partner introductions included where we have existing relationships.

    See engagement models

    Industries we serve with this

    FAQ

    Do we need a money transmission license?
    Depends on the flow. Marketplace payments where funds pass through your ledger typically require MTL or a BaaS partner with one. Direct merchant integration (Stripe Connect) usually doesn't. We map the regulatory requirement to the architecture in discovery and won't build a flow that creates unexpected licensing exposure.
    Which PSP do you recommend?
    Stripe for developer experience and speed to market. Adyen for multi-market, high volume, and direct acquirer access. Checkout.com for competitive interchange in Europe and MENA. We build a PSP abstraction layer so the choice isn't permanent — switching later costs a week of engineering, not a rewrite.
    What makes a double-entry ledger different from a payments database?
    Payments databases track transactions. A double-entry ledger tracks balances with an audit trail that proves every balance from first principles. Every debit has a credit; every balance is derivable from the transaction log; no balance can go negative without an explicit decision. This is what auditors and regulators mean when they say 'show your work'.
    How do you handle chargebacks?
    Automated evidence assembly from your order data, shipping records, and usage logs — formatted for the card network's dispute response format. Deadline tracking and reminders so no dispute response is missed. Win-rate reporting by dispute reason code so you can fix the product issues that generate the most chargebacks.

    Ready to talk embedded finance & payments?

    30-minute scoping call. No obligation, no hard sell.